RE: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se

From: Kucera Miroslav (Miroslav.Kucera@idnes.cz)
Date: 25. 06. 2003, 16:51 CEST

Previous message: Daniel Peder [INFOSET.CZ]: "Re: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Maybe in reply to: ysha: "Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Next in thread: michal@chleboun.cz: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Next in thread: Marek Prokop: "RE: Re[2]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Reply: michal@chleboun.cz: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Reply: Petr Vales - Hledat.CZ: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ano, spravne, ale jenom v pripade, ze seznam ma v podmince pouzivani freemailu napsano, ze muze svym uzivatelum posilat reklamu (coz asi ma =). Pokud tam seznam nic takoveho nema, pak je to SPAM.

MK

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: michal@chleboun.cz [mailto:michal@chleboun.cz]
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:48 PM
>>To: reklama@nawebu.cz; Daniel.Peder@infoset.cz
>>Subject: Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se
>>
>>
>>No moment, kdyz si koupim u Seznamu 100k direct mailu (roz. 
>>osloveni 100k
>>uzivatelu freemailu, nikoli 100k e-mailovych adres), nespamuju!!!
>>
>>michal@chleboun.cz
>>

Previous message: Daniel Peder [INFOSET.CZ]: "Re: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Maybe in reply to: ysha: "Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Next in thread: michal@chleboun.cz: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Next in thread: Marek Prokop: "RE: Re[2]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Reply: michal@chleboun.cz: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Reply: Petr Vales - Hledat.CZ: "Re: Re[4]: Hezka definice spamu :-] - Nebojte se"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 25. 06. 2003, 16:50 CEST