RE: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?

From: Kucera Miroslav (Miroslav.Kucera@idnes.cz)
Date: 12. 06. 2003, 09:16 CEST

Previous message: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Maybe in reply to: David Weil: "OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Next in thread: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Next in thread: Kucera Miroslav: "RE: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Reply: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Martin Kostelník [mailto:kostelnik@yashica.cz]

>>A proc tedy REFERENDUM? Pokud ta vize je natolik jasna, 
>>reklamni kampan
>>pomerne silna a podle vsech pruzkumu vychazelo vzdycky ANO 
>>... Mohli jsme si
>>usetrit peknych par milionu na prispevek do Evropskeho 
>>rozpoctu. Prijde mi
>>taky dosti protichudne rici: referendum ano, ale budeme 
>>vsechno delat proto,
>>aby to vyslo tak jak chceme (z pozice vlady).

Vlada a Parlament se casto nechovaji logicky.

>>IMHO reklama na referendum mela objektivne informovat a ne 
>>podsouvat ANO !!!

Vy jste snad nekdy videl reklamu, ktera by nekdy OBJEKTIVNE
informovala, resp., videl jste nekdy reklamu, ktera by vam
podsouvala neco jineho nez ANO? (o koupi)?

MK

Previous message: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Maybe in reply to: David Weil: "OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Next in thread: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Next in thread: Kucera Miroslav: "RE: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Reply: Aben Siatris: "Re: OT: EU - co kdyz ne?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 12. 06. 2003, 09:15 CEST